UPDATE: Earlier today, Wednesday, Darienite.com published a letter to the editor (below) from Benoît Jamar of Raiders Lane saying that first selectman candidate Tara Ochman had said in the candidates debate that she had testified in Hartford against the “proposed ‘take over'” of town zoning regulations by the state. He said Ochman’s campaign had not responded to his request for the transcript of that testimony.
Ochman has replied today in a letter to Jamar (also below) that she had not, in fact, testified in Hartford about zoning, only about education matters, and, after reviewing the debate video, she confirmed that she didn’t say in the debate (or anywhere else) that she had testified about zoning.
Ochman sent Darienite.com her emailed reply to Jamar, dated Oct. 24 (this past Sunday), and a copy of her second reply, sent today (Wednesday).
Ochman’s First Reply to Jamar
(Sunday, Oct. 24, 9:48 p.m.)
Thank you for reaching out. I was in Hartford to testify against bills associated with school regionalization and the creation of special education cooperative.
And, on both issues I was the only locally elected official to testify in person on behalf of Darien. All associated bills did ultimately fail.
I believe during the debate, I referenced that I thought the zoning bills brought in Hartford last year went too far, and did not understand the impact on small towns. I did not support them. Those bills also did not pass. However, I did not testify on those, and in my elected position on the Board Education I would not have had standing to do so.
Mr. Kleins views of affordable housing are his own, but I think it is safe to say we can all support good leaders even when we disagree on particular issues.
Leading the Board of Education as Chairman for three years, on a 6-3 Republican majority Board, has taught me that many times groups have to work together to create sound results often times among differing views.
I hope that is helpful. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.
My Best- Tara
Ochman’s Second Email to Jamar
(Sent today, Wednesday, Oct. 27, at 3:36 p.m.)
I was vey surprised to read a letter in the Darienite saying that I had not responded to your question.
Please see email below which was sent on Sunday evening.
Also, I went back and rewatched the LWV debate. I did not say I had testified on the zoning bills.
I did say I had been to Hartford as a locally elected official to testify against bills not in the best interest of Darien. And, I reaffirmed that I would testify for or against bills based on what was in the best interest of Darien, whether they were brought by Democrats or Republicans . You can find my exact comments at minute 35 of the debate.
I would respectfully request a retraction, or correction.
If you have any other questions please let me know. I’m happy to have an open dialogue with you, but I did find this letter particularly concerning.
It may be the case that is was submitted by someone on your behalf who was not informed.
My Best- Tara
Original post, Wednesday morning:
Original headline: I’ve Asked Her Campaign, But Still Don’t Have Ochman’s Statement to Legislature Committee on Zoning
To the editor:
During the candidates debate of the Darien League of Women Voters, Tara Ochman stated that she was the only candidate who had gone to Hartford to testify against the proposed “take over” by Hartford of our zoning regulations.
I searched extensively for that testimony, but did not find any testimony by Ms. Ochman regarding zoning regionalization. The only thing I found was Tara Ochman reading a prepared statement against school regionalization and then answering a question more in support of school regionalization than against it.
I then used the “contact me” feature on Tara Ochman’s website to request a transcript of her testimony against the proposed bills on zoning regulation, but never received any answer.
Did Tara Ochman really testify in Hartford against the proposed regionalization of the zoning regulations?
If yes, shouldn’t Darien voters be allowed to see that testimony? Or do we need to use the freedom of information act to see it?